Recognition of Bible Authority

Recognition of Bible Authority


Lesson 2:

The authority of God in men’s lives has always been an important principle, but one just as often neglected or ignored. Bible authority for the church and its individual members is established on the pages of the New Testament, but many important lessons can be gleaned from an examination of the Old Testament as well.

Bible Authority in the Old Testament

A classic lesson is learned from God’s command to Noah to build the ark. The Lord specified that his servant should use gopher wood, without explicitly prohibiting other types of wood. Noah, recognizing the authority and wisdom of the Lord, used gopher wood and “did according to all that God commanded him” (Gen. 6:22). God does not have to condemn things explicitly for when he has explicitly commanded one thing, all else is necessarily excluded.

Good intentions do not negate the power of God’s authority either. In 2 Samuel 6, Uzzah reached out his hand to catch a toppling ark of the covenant and was struck dead on the spot for his well-
intentioned transgression.

Neither can personal preference ascend God’s authority. In Leviticus 10, Nadab and Abihu offered God worship in a way that he had not specified, but which evidently appealed to these priests.

Their incense was called “perverse” because God “had not commanded them.”

The primary authority for worship and life in the Old Testament was the law of Moses, delivered at Sinai in the form of the ten commandments and many subsequent regulations.

Bible Authority in the New Testament

Jesus asserted his privilege to total authority over his disciples just before his ascension into heaven:

“All authority has been given to me in heaven and on earth“ (Matt. 28:18). James concurred that there was “one lawgiver for the church” (4:12). And so we also heed the decree of Peter that “if any man speak, let him speak as the oracles of God” (1 Peter 4:11).

Christians must recognize the authority of the written word revealed in the New Testament as an infallible expression of God’s will. Many denominations resort to creeds, which originated as attempts to express what certain groups interpreted the New Testament to mean. After one or two centuries, however, most of these artificial creeds have mutated further and further away from the Bible. Many, for instance, are condoning homosexuality and unscriptural marriages, things clearly condemned in the New Testament (1 Cor. 6, Matt. 19). Catholicism openly admits that it does not consider the Bible as the sole authority and relies instead on the oral tradition handed down by her popes. Catholicism often finds itself contradicting the Bible (Matt. 23).

In Lesson Eight, we will examine the place of the Old Testament in the understanding of the church. Suffice it, for now, to say that the Old Testament authority has been taken away (Eph. 2:14-16) and only authority found in the testament of Christ is fit to direct us.

Hermeneutics

Bible authority for the work and worship of the church, as well as the actions of the individual, can be established by studying the New Testament. Anything that is commanded is obviously authorized. For instance, Jesus commanded the apostles to take the gospel into the whole world (Matt. 28:19-20).

Secondly, any approved example is also authorized. We find the early disciples partook of the Lord’s supper on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7). Finally, any inference that must necessarily be made is also authorized. In order to fulfill the great commission, we must infer that some means of transport be used (foot, boat, car, plane, etc.).

1. What principle can be gleaned from Noah’s obedience to God’s command to build the ark with gopher wood? How might this principle affect the way we view God’s command to sing in Ephesians 5:19?

• We learn that God’s specific instructions cannot be altered if we hope to do just as God commands us. Explicit instruction is not open to interpretation. In Ephesians 5:19, God says to sing and to substitute “play” for sing is to reject God’s will for our own.

2. Does the fact that God did not explicitly forbid milk and cookies in the Lord’s Supper allow us to
make the substitution? Why, or why not?

• God does not need to specify everything forbidden for when he commands one thing, it necessarily
eliminates every other possibility.

3. What are some examples of things done in the name of religion that is defended against questions of authority as being good works, too good to neglect? How does the case of Uzzah affect this principle?

• Orphan homes, retirement homes, colleges, recreational facilities, banquet facilities, homeless programs, etc. Uzzah had good intentions in reaching for the ark but violated the law when he did.

4. What things are done in the name of religion that can only be traced to personal preference, rather than scriptural mandate? What does the case of Nadab and Abihu add to this concept?

• Instrumental music, denominational names, modern worship forms, etc. Nadab sought what was either more convenient or personally pleasing in offering perverse fire to God and were condemned.

5. Summarize what each of the following passages contributes to an understanding of Bible authority:

a. Matthew 28:18: All authority belongs to Christ, not mere men with their creeds and traditions.

b. Matthew 15:7-9: Christ forbids us to teach as doctrines the commandments of men.

c. James 4:12: God is the only lawgiver for the church; no man has the right to amend the Bible.

d. 1 Peter 4:11: We should only speak as the word of God reveals, not according to our wills.

e. Col. 3:17: Whatever we do should be by Christ’s authority.

6. Why are denominational creeds unnecessary? What does Catholicism claim as additional authority to the Bible?

• They claim to interpret the Bible but in fact, are amendable documents that change as society reconsiders various matters of morality like remarriage, homosexuality, and women’s roles. Catholicism claims oral tradition from its succession of popes as an additional authority.

7. Why is it improper to appeal to the Old Testament to use instrumental music, animal sacrifice, and the burning of incense (Gal. 5:3, James 2:10)?

• The Old Testament was nailed to the cross with Jesus and so is no fit authority in the age of the last will and testament of God’s son. To pluck one of these from the Old Testament would require keeping them all.

8. Give an example of a direct command as the authority in the New Testament.

• The Lord’s Supper (1 Cor. 11), the great commission (Matt. 28), the collection (1 Cor. 16).

9. Give an approved example as authority for action in the New Testament.

• Lord’s supper on the first day of the week, assembling on the first day of the week, traveling by boat.

10. Give an example of necessary inference as the authority in the New Testament.

• The command to assemble necessarily implies a place in which to assemble; the command to go preach necessarily implies a means of transportation.